Drug Trafficking

Experienced Drug Trafficking Lawyers Edmonton

Drug trafficking trials are among the most complicated trials in the criminal justice system to run. This is because the rules for dealing with confidential informants, search warrants and other judicial authorizations (e.g., tracking warrants, wiretaps, etc.) are highly complex.

At Purser Law, we have extensive experience dealing with search warrants, undercover operations and drug trafficking charges, generally. We know what disclosure is required to properly defend against these charges. In many instances, after reviewing the disclosure obtained through our requests and reading our Charter notices, the Crown will simply drop the charges against our clients.

Drug Trafficking in Alberta

Much like firearms trafficking, on conviction drug trafficking offences can come with significant jail sentences, with first time offenders being sentenced to anywhere between three (3) and nine (9) years of imprisonment for a single offence. As such, if you have been charged with drug trafficking, it is important to find an Edmonton Drug Lawyer who has experience dealing with these kinds of investigations.

Free Consultation

If you have been charged with a drug trafficking offence, call an Edmonton Criminal Lawyer at Purser Law now at 1-800-523-6202 for a free 30-minute consultation or book online now.

Criminal Defence Lawyers Edmonton

Read Our Reviews

Purser Law is a highly regarded Criminal Defence & Appeals law firm based in Edmonton.

When it comes to criminal law, Purser Law stands out as a reliable and experienced choice for anyone in need of an experienced Edmonton Criminal Lawyer. Take a look at our Google reviews to see for yourself what makes Purser Law one the most highly rated Criminal Law firms in Edmonton.

Notable Cases

R v B.L., 2022 ABPC (Unreported)

Despite owning the residence where a significant amount of illegal drugs were located, the Crown stayed (i.e., dropped) charges of possession for the purpose of trafficking after Stacey skillfully drafted a Statutory Declaration for her client.

R v D.S., 2021 ABQB (Unreported)

After extensive cross-examination of three officers who received confidential informant information and conducted surveillance, prior to obtaining a search warrant, the Crown withdrew 11 gun and drug trafficking charges against Stacey's client.

R v T.T., 2020 ABQB (Unreported)

After going the extra mile at the preliminary inquiry of a serious drug-trafficking case, and bringing an application to cross-examine the Affiant (i.e. author) of a search warrant, the Crown stayed (i.e., dropped) charges of possession for the purpose of trafficking against Stacey’s client.