When sexual assault trials go wrong, the appeals come to us. We would rather win yours the first time.
If you have been charged, the most important decision you will make is who prepares your defence. At Purser Law, preparation is not a slogan: we begin preparing our clients to testify at least one month before trial, in weekly sessions. To date, no client who completed that preparation has been convicted of sexual assault.
Past results do not guarantee your outcome, but preparation is the part of your case you control.
You tell us what happened, in confidence.
You get a frank assessment of where you stand.
No pressure, no obligation.
Sexual assault under section 271 of the Criminal Code is any intentional touching of a sexual nature without consent. The law centres on consent, not violence. No injury is required, and no witnesses are required.
Two things surprise almost everyone we meet. First, contrary to popular opinion, no evidence other than the Complainant’s testimony is required for the Crown to seek a conviction. Second, there is no statute of limitations. We have defended allegations brought decades after the events were said to have happened.
For a fuller plain-language explainer, see what is sexual assault in Canada.
The honest answer to “am I going to jail?” is that it depends on the facts, and the exposure is serious. Sexual assault can proceed summarily or by indictment, and indictable convictions carry the possibility of years in a penitentiary. Where the Complainant is under 16, mandatory minimums apply. [Lawyer to verify current ranges before publishing.]
Jail is only the beginning of the list. A conviction typically brings registration under SOIRA, the national sex offender registry. It can bring firearms prohibitions. For permanent residents, it can mean removal from Canada; we have seen deportation turn on the difference between one conviction and another, which is why we fight over that difference. And a conviction follows you through employment checks, travel, and reputation permanently.
This is why these files are defended with everything available, and why decisions made in the first weeks matter so much.
Police may say they just want your side. You have the right to silence. Use it until you have counsel. Politely say: “I want to speak to a lawyer.”
Not to explain, not to apologize, not through friends. Contact can breach conditions and becomes evidence.
Texts, social media, photos, receipts, location data. Delete nothing. In our experience, message threads win these cases more often than speeches do.
Privately, for your lawyer, while memory is fresh.
Friends can be subpoenaed.
The earliest decisions are the ones you cannot take back.
Most sexual assault trials come down to two accounts of the same events. The legal battleground is consent, credibility, and what evidence the court is allowed to hear.
Consent must be communicated, and a belief in consent must be both honest and reasonable, with steps taken to ascertain it. These defences have real limits, and knowing where the limits sit is the difference between a defence that works and one that collapses mid-trial.
Judges assess testimony under the framework from R v W.(D.). The practical point: your evidence does not need to be believed outright to win. If it leaves the judge or jury with a reasonable doubt, that is enough. Preparing you to give that evidence well is the core of our method.
Since the Criminal Code changes that followed the “me too” era, admissibility has narrowed. Sexual-history evidence requires a s. 276 application. Records in third parties’ hands require their own application. We have won cases at this stage; in one, an application to cross-examine the Complainant on text messages inconsistent with her account ended with the Crown staying the charges before trial.
Due to the highly charged nature of sexual assault prosecutions, we frequently recommend electing trial by Judge and Jury where available. Not for every case, but for most. Jury trials are a different craft from judge-alone trials, and your lawyer should have run both. If a conviction has already happened, appeals are our other home ground: see sexual assault conviction appeals.
Preparation is the key to a successful trial, and testimony is where these trials are won or lost. We begin preparing our clients to testify at least one month before trial, with weekly sessions. You will have thought about the hard questions long before a prosecutor asks them, so you can testify comfortably and present your side of the story at your best.
Most sexual assault charges come with release conditions, often no-contact terms. Unworkable conditions can be varied by application. Bail for sexual assault charges.
The Crown must provide its evidence: statements, messages, police notes. No serious decision gets made before we have read all of it.
For most sexual assault charges you choose the mode of trial. Judge alone or Judge and Jury is a strategic decision we make together, and it is one of the most important in the case.
The Crown goes first. Whether and how you testify is decided with counsel, and if you do, you will be prepared for it in the way described above.
A conviction is not always the end. Appeals run on legal error, and finding those errors is the founding practice of this firm. Appealing a conviction.
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is decided on its own facts.
| Charge | Court | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Sexual assault | ABKB, 2023 (unreported) | Crown stayed (i.e., dropped) the charges after our application to cross-examine the Complainant on inconsistent text messages, sparing our client a Jury Trial |
| Sexual assault | ABQB, 2022 (unreported) | Acquittal after successfully defending against a Crown pre-trial application to admit prejudicial evidence |
| Child sexual assault | ABQB, 2022 (unreported) | Acquittal on all charges; the trial judge could not discount the Complainant’s motive to fabricate |
| Sexual assault | ABQB, 2021 (unreported) | Conviction overturned on breach of the right to adequate interpretation; client and family spared deportation |
| Sexual assault | ABQB, 2021 (unreported) | Unanimous jury acquittal for a client we believe was wrongfully accused |
| Sexual assault of a minor (2 counts) | Alberta Court of Appeal, R v G.T., 2021 ABCA 75 | Substituted verdicts of acquittal on appeal, with no re-trial required |
| Sexual assault | ABQB, 2020 (unreported) | Conviction substituted to simple assault; sentence reduced from 12 to 5 months, preserving our Permanent Resident client from deportation |
| Child sexual assault | ABQB, 2019 (unreported, summary conviction appeal) | Conviction overturned; the trial judge applied uneven scrutiny to the accused’s evidence |
| Youth sexual assault | NWT Court of Appeal, R v J.C., 2018 NWTCA 5 | Conviction overturned as an unreasonable verdict, a notoriously difficult ground of appeal |
| Sexual assault | ABQB, 2017 (unreported) | Crown agreed to overturn the conviction and not re-prosecute, on insufficient reasons for judgment |
The first conversation costs nothing and changes everything about how the next months feel. Bring your paperwork and your questions. We will tell you honestly where your case stands, what we would do with it, and what it costs.
780-851-7435